DC Field | Value | Language |
dc.contributor.author | Mekuria, Belachew | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-06-24T07:58:33Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-06-24T07:58:33Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2011-12 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1297 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The right to development stands out as one of the controversial rights ever
since its articulation in the 1970s. The adoption of the 1986 United Nations
Declaration on the Right to Development underlines the importance of
international cooperation for it to be realised. I argue that the emphasis on
‘development aid’ rather than the broader ‘development cooperation’ has
contributed a great deal to the politicisation of the right and consequently
undermined its materialisation. Indeed, there is the need for semantic and
conceptual clarity in the use of the term ‘international assistance and
cooperation’ that has deceptively supplanted ‘international cooperation.’ While
the former is a term used under Article 2(1) of the International Covenant on
Economic, Social and Cultural Rights with a view to laying down the broader
States Parties’ obligations, the latter is what the Declaration on the Right to
Development exclusively employs. I argue that even if development assistance
is indispensable, taking it as the sole approach to the realisation of the right to development is both wrong and unhelpful. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | St. Mary's University | en_US |
dc.subject | Right to development; international assistance and cooperation; the New
International Economic Order; the Declaration on the Right to Development | en_US |
dc.title | Vol 5. No 2 THE POLITICS UNDERPINNING THE NONREALISATION OF THE RIGHT TO DEVELOPMENT | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Mizan Law Review
|