DC Field | Value | Language |
dc.contributor.author | Tigabu, Legesse | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-12-10T13:38:53Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-12-10T13:38:53Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016-12 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/mlr.v10i2.2 | - |
dc.description.abstract | together. Lack of accommodation of diversity could lead to conflicts and pose
danger for a union, particularly, in multicultural federal systems like Ethiopia. This
article explores the protection of diverse groups and preservation of a union in
federal systems. It involves a comparative overview of three jurisdictions:
Ethiopia, India and the US. Although comprehensive discussion on the relevant
principles of federalism across these federal systems cannot be done in a single
article, an investigation into the three jurisdictions gives insight as these
jurisdictions demonstrate substantially different federal features while they share
some of the hallmarks of federalism. The US represents a territorial federal
system. Indian federation is multicultural with unique centripetal tendencies and
this would make it a quasi-federal system. The Ethiopian federal system, on the
other hand, appears to empower ethnic groups by making them its building blocks.
This article examines the accommodation of diversity and protection of minorities
in such differently designed federal systems and aims at drawing relevant lessons. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | St.Mary's University | en_US |
dc.subject | Federalism, unity, representation of minorities, ethnic federalism | en_US |
dc.title | Vol. 10 No.2:Federalism as an Instrument for Unity and the Protection of Minorities: A Comparative Overview: Ethiopia, India and the US | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Mizan Law Review
|