Skip navigation
st. Mary's University Institutional Repository St. Mary's University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/6523
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYohannes, Seyoum-
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-10T13:43:06Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-10T13:43:06Z-
dc.date.issued2016-12-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.4314/mlr.v10i2.3-
dc.description.abstractThis article examines the extent of party autonomy in determining the norms that apply to the substance of a commercial dispute in arbitration. Particularly, it analyses ‘principles of law,’ the normative basis for arbitration under Ethiopian law. The article further explores whether parties to arbitration are at liberty to mandate the application of foreign law, rules of law and equity. It also examines whether a ‘mandate to settle’ is enforceable under Ethiopian law. The article concludes that Ethiopian law allows maximum flexibility to parties as regards to the determination of norms applicable to the substance of a commercial dispute. The law can even be construed as recognising ‘mandate to settle’.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSt.Mary's Universityen_US
dc.subjectCommercial arbitration, party autonomy, principles of law, foreign law, rules of law, equity, mandate to settle, amiable composition, Ethiopia.en_US
dc.titleVol. 10 No.2:The Normative Basis for Decision on the Merits in Commercial Arbitration: The Extent of Party Autonomyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Mizan Law Review

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Mizan LR_10(2)_Dec. 2016-83-107.pdf212.98 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.