DC Field | Value | Language |
dc.contributor.author | Beyene, Mesfin | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-12-13T07:13:12Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-12-13T07:13:12Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019-09 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/mlr.v13i1.5 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The 1958 New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign
Arbitral awards is currently ratified by 161 states. The Convention gives a visa for
arbitral awards made in a Convention state and guarantees enforcement of the
award elsewhere except on few grounds. It imposes obligations on states and their
courts to recognize and enforce foreign arbitral awards and arbitration agreements.
It also imposes on courts the obligation to stay proceeding with a matter subject to
the arbitration agreement. Ethiopia has not yet ratified the NYC. This article aims at
demonstrating the challenges and prospects of ratification of the Convention by
Ethiopia. I argue that by ratifying the Convention, Ethiopia would be able to, inter
alia, increase trade and investment, get access to lower interest rates and rates of
return, improve its international image, improve on competition for trade and
investment, improve its arbitration system, decrease caseloads of courts and hasten
its move towards the accession to WTO. These factors show that it is in the
country's interest to ratify the Convention and domesticate it through the
instrumentality of the UNCITRAL Model Law. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | St.Mary's University | en_US |
dc.subject | Commercial arbitration · New York Convention · Ethiopian laws · UNCITRAL· Model Law · Ethiopia | en_US |
dc.title | Vol. 13 No.1:Towards a Better Commercial Arbitration: Should Ethiopia Ratify the New York Convention? | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Mizan Law Review
|