Skip navigation
st. Mary's University Institutional Repository St. Mary's University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/6602
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMeheretu, Alemu-
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-13T08:05:45Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-13T08:05:45Z-
dc.date.issued2019-12-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.4314/mlr.v13i3.5-
dc.description.abstractMany jurisdictions use criminal informants –suspects or defendants who provide evidence in return to a charge or a sentence benefit– to investigate and prosecute mainly organized crimes. Ethiopia has also embraced this investigation and prosecution tool with respect to some selected crimes. This article examines and explicates the legal framework on criminal informant in the context of four proclamations governing corruption, terrorism, trafficking and smuggling in persons, and witness and whistle blowers protection. I argue that the law suffers considerable limitations and gaps in articulating complete, clear and coherent standards for informant selection, and consistent concessions and benefits, as well as in terms of instituting adequate guarantees and meaningful enforcement mechanisms to protect defendants against the blemishes of the informant system.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSt.Mary's Universityen_US
dc.subjectCriminal informant · Evidence · Substantial evidence · Concessions · Safeguards · Witness protection · Ethiopia.en_US
dc.titleVol. 13 No.3:The Law of Criminal Informant in Ethiopiaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Mizan Law Review

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Mizan LR_13(3)Dec. 2019-114-143.pdf619.28 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.