DC Field | Value | Language |
dc.contributor.author | Meheretu, Alemu | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-12-13T08:05:45Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-12-13T08:05:45Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019-12 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/mlr.v13i3.5 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Many jurisdictions use criminal informants –suspects or defendants who provide
evidence in return to a charge or a sentence benefit– to investigate and prosecute
mainly organized crimes. Ethiopia has also embraced this investigation and
prosecution tool with respect to some selected crimes. This article examines and
explicates the legal framework on criminal informant in the context of four
proclamations governing corruption, terrorism, trafficking and smuggling in
persons, and witness and whistle blowers protection. I argue that the law suffers
considerable limitations and gaps in articulating complete, clear and coherent
standards for informant selection, and consistent concessions and benefits, as well
as in terms of instituting adequate guarantees and meaningful enforcement
mechanisms to protect defendants against the blemishes of the informant system. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | St.Mary's University | en_US |
dc.subject | Criminal informant · Evidence · Substantial evidence · Concessions · Safeguards · Witness protection · Ethiopia. | en_US |
dc.title | Vol. 13 No.3:The Law of Criminal Informant in Ethiopia | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Mizan Law Review
|