DC Field | Value | Language |
dc.contributor.author | Ashagre, Aschalew | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-12-13T11:38:31Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-12-13T11:38:31Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020-12 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/mlr.v14i2.2 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Under the 2016 Federal Tax Administration Proclamation (FTAP), it is by way
of appeal that taxpayers reach the judiciary when they can show that the Federal
Tax Appeal Commission (FTAC) has committed an error of law. As far as
factual issues are concerned, the decision of the FTAC is thus final and
conclusive. Ethiopia’s tax dispute resolution system has made improvements
although there has been discontent on the part of taxpayers. This article
examines the tax appeal processes at the federal level to see whether the
processes enhance fair play between taxpayers and the tax authority.
Specifically, the article evaluates whether there are clear and adequate
procedural rules that ensure access to justice for aggrieved taxpayers and fair
treatment by the Federal Tax Appeal Commission (FTAC). I argue that
although there have been certain improvements made by the FTAP (as far as
administrative appeal before the FTAC is concerned), there are still some
critical shortcomings that have to be reconsidered. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | St.Mary's University | en_US |
dc.subject | Tax appeal · Tax Appeal Commission · Hearing · Burden of proof · Ethiopia | en_US |
dc.title | Vol. 14 No.2:Tax Appeal Proceedings before the Federal Tax Appeal Commission in Ethiopia: Critical Reflections | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Mizan Law Review
|