DC Field | Value | Language |
dc.contributor.author | Andualem, Tsega | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-12-13T11:55:30Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-12-13T11:55:30Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021-09 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/mlr.v15i1.1 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Ensuring National Unity and upholding Human Rights have always been a big
challenge in Ethiopia, since the establishment of the modern Ethiopian state.
These problems are still troubling the country, long after the adoption of the
present Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia (FDRE) Constitution, which
is claimed to have addressed them once and for all. This article seeks to revisit
the historical underpinnings of the FDRE Constitution and its ethnic-centered
design, in relation to its actual capacity to achieve national unity and adequate
protection of human rights. The article demonstrates how human dignity
centered constitutional design and interpretation could advance both national
unity and adequate protection of rights. It argues that the historical foundation
of the FDRE Constitution and the design that came out of it is backward
looking, exclusionary and inadequate to address both challenges for a number
of reasons. As a possible alternative, it proposes a human dignity centered rereading
of history, constitutional design and interpretation. Since Ethiopia is in
a process of reform in various spheres, the issues raised and discussed in the
article deserve serious attention as they are essential to move forward. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | St.Mary's University | en_US |
dc.subject | Ethnic federalism · National unity · Human rights · Human dignity · Constitutional design · Ethiopia | en_US |
dc.title | Vol. 15 No.1:An Enduring Path for National Unity and Human Rights Protection in Ethiopia: A Case for Human Dignity Centered Constitutional Design and Interpretation | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Mizan Law Review
|