Skip navigation
st. Mary's University Institutional Repository St. Mary's University Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/7445
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBisare, Bilate-
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-27T13:29:18Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-27T13:29:18Z-
dc.date.issued2022-09-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/7445-
dc.description.abstractThis comment examines the Legal framework of Collective Labour Disputes (CLD) resolution by the Labour Relation Board (LRB) in Ethiopia. Only two members of the LRB out of seven members (and two alternate members) are from the legal profession. Moreover, there is no provision (under the Labour Proclamation) regarding the selection criteria of other members of the Board. The decision of the Board is taken by majority vote and appeal is permitted only on error relating to legal issues. The establishment of LRB that is empowered to decide on CLDs is indeed an extremely important initiative as the nature of collective labour cases demands collective bargaining and labour law experts. However, legal criteria are not set out under the Proclamation for the selection of members of the LRB; and the majority of LRB members are not legal professionals. There should thus be clear criteria for the selection of members and there is the need to include more legal professionals in the LRB.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSt.Mary's Universityen_US
dc.subjectLabour Relation • Collective Disputes • Labour Board • Disputes Resolutionen_US
dc.titleResolution of Collective Labour Disputes by Labour Relations Board in Ethiopia: Critical Reflectionsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Mizan Law Review

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Resolution of Collective Labour Disput.pdf230 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.