DC Field | Value | Language |
dc.contributor.author | Stebek, Elias N. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-06-22T08:47:00Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-06-22T08:47:00Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2013-12 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/918 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This article examines lessons that can be drawn from the land rights regimes of
four countries that have commendable economic performance. It highlights the
nature of land rights during the developmental statehood pursuits of three East
Asian states (South Korea, Taiwan and Singapore) and a country that currently
pursues socialist market economic policy, i.e. China. The themes that are
considered include (a) lessons from the land rights regime in South Korea
including the salient features of developmental states, (b) Taiwan’s land reform
during the early 1950s and land requisition for industrial use, (c) China’s land
rights regime and administrative laws, and (d) land rights in Singapore and
entrepreneur perceptions about its institutions. These countries are chosen due
to their relevance to the Ethiopian land law regime. The article highlights how
South Korea and Taiwan carried out effective land reform by redistributing
private land rights without resorting to nationalization. It is argued that neither
the notion of state ownership of land as practised in Singapore nor current
improvements in the scope of Chinese land use rights explain the denial of
economic value to land use rights. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | St. Mary's University | en_US |
dc.subject | Land use rights, developmental state, land reform, property rights. | en_US |
dc.title | Vol 7. No 2 Overview of Country Experience in Land Rights and Developmental Statehood: South Korea, Taiwan, China and Singapore | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Mizan Law Review
|